Written in Business School While Volunteering for America

WOWEE my laptop has some cool scenarios floating around!!!






Running Head:  BILLINGS AREA RESOURCE NETWORK




The Billings Area Resource Network- A Coalition to Impact Homelessness

Miranda Dye

Transitional Leadership MGT 370

October 6, 2008



Abstract
The Billings Area Resource Network (BARN) is a collaboration of service providers that work together to impact homelessness in Billings.  The BARN began in 2006 when the Mayor’s Committee on Homelessness decided they needed a group of service providers to steer their mission in the right direction.  The BARN is a critical component of the Mayor’s Committee as they help to achieve many of their over-arching goals.  This is a core group of dedicated people, whom are very passionate about impacting homelessness in Billings.  Many of their jobs consist of working with the homeless population or those in poverty, so it makes sense for them to be involved. 



Billings Area Resource Network:
History of the Organization
            The Billings Area Resource Network (BARN) was established in 2006, along with the Mayor’s Committee on Homelessness.  Mayor Ron Tussing accepted the charge of ending homelessness in Billings, by becoming the pilot project city for the state of Montana.  A national initiative to fight homelessness was established in 2001 by President George W. Bush.  Bush reactivated the Interagency Council on Homelessness and appointed Philip Mangano as executive director of the HUD based program.  Mangano is known as the President’s “Czar on Homelessness,” and canvases for interested sites throughout the country.  Mangano paved the way for Billings to become the pilot project for the state, by meeting with the Mayor of Billings and over 75 local people in 2006.  He is a charismatic man who encourages innovation in the approach to end homelessness.  It was decided in that meeting that Billings would develop a Ten-Year Plan to End Homelessness, and formed the Mayor’s Committee.  Members of the Mayor’s committee include mostly executive directors from differing sectors of the community.  There is also one “consumer” that was chosen based on the idea, that you have to have the input of the population you are trying to serve.  When formulating this committee it was evident that there was one major sector of the community that was not being represented, the service providers.  Who better to understand the needs of the people, than those who serve their needs?  It was decided that a network of service providers would be key to the development of the Ten-Year Plan, and thus the creation of the BARN.  (Beckett, 2007)

The Organization’s Purpose
The BARN was not the first coalition of its kind in Billings.  It was just the first to be administered by our city government.  In the past two years many different groups with aligning goals have become members of the BARN.  The Yellowstone County Homeless Board has recently joined the BARN, also donating their financial resources.  A lot of the people or agencies in the BARN have been working on the homelessness issue for years, but usually in separate arenas.  Now there is a consistent meeting time and place for these service providers to come together, share ideas and resources.  They have common goals, hope to leave behind personal agendas and also solve the problem of homelessness.  The goals of the BARN are to reduce barriers, gaps and duplication within the service array in Billings. 
There are subcommittees in the BARN including: Benefits Acquisition; Treatment; Housing; Continuum of Care; and Membership/Publicity.
 I joined the BARN in October of 2007, so I am not quite sure how the group functioned in its first year.  When I first started going to meetings, I was in the middle of my service provider interviews (53) and had already gotten to know some of the other attendees.  One of my VISTA work plan goals was to increase BARN membership, so at every interview I would offer a brief description and a BARN application.  I didn’t know much about the BARN at the time, but I sure did encourage membership.   Soon, after two meetings my role in the BARN was upgraded to “city liaison.”  This meant I was to keep track of membership and facilitate meeting discussions.  I also signed up for the Membership/Publicity and Continuum of Care sub-committees.  Since October 2007, membership has at least doubled, as more agencies are hearing that the BARN is a functional organization.  “Build it and they will come.” (Field of Dreams, 1989)
For some time I did not understand what was expected of me or what was being built.  I just kept going to all the meetings; steering, monthly, and sub-committee meetings.  It really started to make more sense to me in December 2007 and January 2008, when we had our strategic planning session.  The facilitator for the planning sessions was great, and it seemed that the group left the two sessions with focus and determination.  When the 30 people there were asked who would create the strategic plan based on all of our notes, guess who raised her hand?  Yes, here I was undertaking yet another confusing and daunting task.  When I was putting the notes together I noticed there was a lot of room for interpretation.  Who was I to make any changes?  I guess I was “allowed” that freedom, because the final strategic plan is much more elaborate, and only the steering committee has seen it.  My supervisor asked me to format it to resemble the other Ten-Year Plan documents, so that is what I did.  Now the BARN has a strategic plan for fiscal year 2008-2009.
Strengths and Weaknesses
The strength in this group is found in the diversity of its members.  The members come from different backgrounds and bring different perspectives to the table.  From prevention of homelessness to the homeless shelter, the group meets almost every area of need.  The BARN on itself does not provide direct services, but the group as a whole strives to meet the needs of the homeless population. They are very dedicated to making a difference in the community and work together to accomplish this.  They all have access to resources and agree that each individual is valuable.  In strategic planning we decided on the concept that “everyone has a right to have their basic needs met with respect and dignity.” This overall concept is what drives the group to be advocates for changes within the homeless services system. With a strong need for reform in the service arena and there is also federal/state money to back up that reform.  The members are willing to take risks in order to make the necessary changes.  They strive to make the public aware of the misconceptions of homelessness, and attempt to look beyond the stereotypical “logic” of what causes someone to be homeless.  Public opinions could be devastating to some, but they move on with the initiative, regardless of the personal consequences.  There is strength in numbers, and the BARN believes that as a collective, we will have the strong voice necessary for change in the community.  Also keeping people off the streets is humane and just makes sense…to us!
There are a few weaknesses in this organization that I will relay in my own opinion.  Membership is constantly revolving, which has proven to be hardship.  Some people show up at every meeting, and others I have never seen…but they have a partnership agreement signed.  There are always a few new people at every meeting, which is good for membership, but difficult for organization.  Keeping track of the membership and email distribution list for the BARN has been a nightmare.   Also there is a realm of the unknown for new members, and meetings can be derailed easily.  Another huge problem is lack of direction, often considered a lack of a specific project.  Many of the members agree whole heartedly with the mission and vision, but really want something more tangible.  A specific project or subcommittee accomplishment would be appropriate at this time.  As all the people in this group have other jobs, they are simply “volunteers” for the BARN.  Since they volunteer their time, there is a need for more direction, or they lose interest.  It has been stated that without a project the BARN is just another monthly meeting they have to sit through.  They would like to see some fruit for their efforts, not just meetings that end with no resolution.  There have also been some suggestions about how to make the meetings more efficient.  One is to have more of a social session get to know one another.  Another suggestion is to present a homeless person’s scenario to the group and have each explain what they would have to offer that person.   Overall this is a group of dedicated people that are in need of some good leadership.
Opportunities and Threats
The opportunities for the group are abundant.  With the right leadership in place this group could accomplish amazing feats for our community.  There will always be needs in the community, as long as the timeless process of poverty continues.  More than likely we won’t see the end of it in our lifetime.  The public has become more aware of this need, and there have been some philanthropic donors to the inititave.  The opportunity to have more publicity for the homeless is out there.  In modern day America it is a disgrace that people have no choice to live on the streets.  “Shame on us.” (Mangano, 2008)  The more the public becomes aware that there are institutions in this country that are not working, the more opportunity there will be to uproot the stereotypes that plague the homeless.
The threats are that the public opinion is that all the homeless are lazy or they have chosen the lifestyle.  The truth of the matter is that a majority of homeless are working, and those that don’t more than likely have a disability that prevents them from doing so.  Even though I know these things the general public is a great threat to this initiative.  Most classify the homeless in to one big category and do not see the individual person.